Sunday, May 12, 2019

An argumentive research paper of how the use of cellphones negatively

An argumentive of how the social function of cellphones negatively affect teenagers - Research Paper ExampleThey cover wide geographic range, ma tycoon their substance ab implement easier, and definitely more convenient for us. They rule a large part of the world trade market. The rivalry between cell phone companies like Nokia, Apple and Samsung has already reached epic proportions. There is a continuous struggle to achieve the position of the top seller in the world market. While Nokia reigned as king in the beginning of the cell phone era, it has lost its initial significance with solely the new and cost-efficient competition. With the increase in the rate of globalization in the last three decades, it only makes sense that the use of cellular phones has reached a phenomenal rate in these thirty years. Cell phones, while initially use only for telephoning purposes, now tolerate a wide range of features incorporated. They have e reallything from camera, games, and music to G PS, email, internet, etc. However, with all these beneficial and advantageous factors in the world, cellular phones have proved to be more of a endanger than a blessing, harming the teenagers and society more than can be accounted for. The purpose of this paper is to prove that cell phones have been more hazardous than beneficial. NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES For a device so small, cell phones are proving to be very dangerous. One of the major problems caused by cell phones is that it endangers the lives of people. Conversation on cell phones while driving is organism banned in most countries because of the number of accidents it causes. These conversations cause what Strayer and Drews term as Inattention cecity in the get hold ofr. Their research proved that, Cell-phone conversations impair driving by inducing a form of thoughtlessness blindness in which device drivers fail to see objects in their driving environment when they are talk of the town on a cell phone (Strayer 128-131). Ma ny people find it hard to multitask. The problem here is however, instead different. It is not about organism unable or finding it hard to multi task but to drive a motor vehicle efficiently while conversing on the phone. These two elements are imperative. Strayer and Drews specifically researched with these two elements as their focal points. When a person is carrying a verbal discussion or only when conversing with members in the car, they found that the inanimate objects on the road do not fly out of the drivers focus. Compared to this, on cell-phone conversations prove a strong distraction, causing the driver to be blind (mostly) to objects on the road. The drivers, in fact, failed to recall the objects they had encountered on the road when driving whilst talking on the phone. Cell phone conversations not only distract us, but they do so to the extent where our memory fails to retain data where it would have, had there been no cell phone in the equation. It is due to this rea son that road accidents caused by people talking on cell phones are reaching a higher number day by day, endangering unobjectionable lives. Cellular phones, while convenient for adults, carry a different sort of attraction for teenagers, music being one of the more popular features amongst them. The use of earphones when listening to music or when on the phone is specially detrimental for teenagers. Earphones or headsets can diminish environmental perception because they cover (part of) the ears. Good environmental repair of environmental sounds is based on a calculation of distance...wavelength between the two

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.